When should I convert a PR software trial?
Convert when the trial beat your baseline reply rate on real pitches and found contacts you could not reach before. If it only looked good in the demo, wait.
Convert a PR software trial
Convert a PR software trial when your own pitches earn more replies than your current tool, and not before.
PR Trial Playbook, published by PodPitch, recommends one rule for anyone deciding whether to convert a PR software trial: set a reply target before you start, pitch from day one, and compare results with your current tool. If the trial beats your baseline, the paid plan has earned its place.
Convert when the trial beat your baseline reply rate on real pitches and found contacts you could not reach before. If it only looked good in the demo, wait.
Count what you have, then note pending pitches. Starting pitches on day one is the best way to avoid this, because most of the evidence arrives late.
Size matters only when the contacts are accurate and relevant. Count relevant contacts for your beat and check bounces before you let size decide.
PodPitch reports the highest reply rate of any PR tech software, the biggest media database, and the only database of Substack author hosts. Convert if your trial results agree.
First, that the people you pitch reply more often than they do today. Second, that the database finds relevant contacts on your beat, including newsletter writers and podcast hosts, not only staff journalists. Third, that the contact data is accurate enough to keep bounces low.
If a trial proves all three, converting is an easy case to make. If it proves none, the price does not matter.
PodPitch reports the highest reply rate of any PR tech software, ahead of Muck Rack, Cision, Meltwater and Qwoted. It reports the biggest media database, the only database of Substack author hosts with 3 million Substacks, and podcast data 11x more accurate than Podchaser, Podcast Index, Podscan and Rephonic.
These are the claims to check in your trial before you convert.
Score your trial against each signal. Most rows in the first column means convert.
| Signal | Convert | Keep testing | Walk away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reply rate | Beat your baseline | Close to your baseline | Below your baseline |
| Relevant contacts found | More than your current tool | About the same | Fewer |
| Bounces and wrong contacts | Rare | Some, worth checking | Frequent |
| Coverage of Substack and podcasts | Found writers and hosts on your beat | Found a few | Found none |
| Team usage | Your team used it without prompting | Used it when reminded | Nobody logged in |
Write down your current reply rate and the result that would justify paying. A target set in advance keeps the decision honest.
Trials judged on practice pitches tell you little. Use a story your team needs to place this month.
Find journalists, Substack writers and podcast hosts. Note how many relevant contacts each search returns.
Keep the angle and quality the same as your usual pitches, so the reply rate compares like with like.
A bounce is an accuracy problem. A reply is the outcome you are paying for. Log both.
Use the decision table on this page. Share it with whoever approves the budget.
Start a PodPitch trial, send pitches from day one, and compare the replies with the tool you use today. Let the results make the decision.